Yes, indeed. This is awesome.

Brian, do you think you can create a last cal-able version of -arch by the
1st week of December?

On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 4:04 PM Brian Trammell (IETF) <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Wow! The robot can write long messages, too. Good work, everyone!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Brian
>
> > On 22 Nov 2019, at 16:00, TAPS WG status robot <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Friday November 22, 2019
> >
> > Issues
> >
> > ietf-tapswg/api-drafts (+12/-25/💬38)
> > 12 issues created:
> >
> >       • #384 Experimental cost property: cost preference (by mwelzl) API
> discuss
> >       • #382 Multicast impact on architecture? (by abrunstrom)
> Architecture
> >       • #375 Multiple receives convenience feature (by MaxF12)
> >       • #374 Protocols in Figure 2 (by abrunstrom) Architecture
> >       • #373 Transport Properties are not Connection Objects (by
> abrunstrom)
> >       • #371 Do we need an example for an HTTP/1, HTTP/2, HTTP/3
> agnostic connection? (by philsbln)
> >       • #367 Implementation - PMTU text is broken (by gorryfair)
> Implementation ready for text
> >       • #366 Some editorial (I hope) comments on implementation (by
> gorryfair)
> >       • #365 Architecture: Editorial comments (by theri)
> >       • #364 Update wording where interface to security protocol implies
> racing/abstraction (by squarooticus)
> >       • #363 "Access to Specialized Features" example: Security
> protocols (by theri) Architecture
> >       • #362 -impl should say more about use of ALPN (by mirjak)
> Architecture
> > 21 issues received 38 new comments:
> >
> >       • #375 Multiple receives convenience feature (6 by britram,
> mwelzl, philsbln, tfpauly, MaxF12) API discuss
> >       • #384 Experimental cost property: cost preference (5 by philsbln,
> mwelzl, gorryfair, tfpauly) API discuss
> >       • #362 -impl should say more about use of ALPN (3 by philsbln,
> gorryfair, theri) Implementation
> >       • #363 "Access to Specialized Features" example: Security
> protocols (3 by philsbln, abrunstrom, squarooticus) Architecture
> >       • #382 Multicast impact on architecture? (3 by tfpauly)
> Architecture
> >       • #305 Protocol stacks that are not equivalent (2 by britram,
> theri) Architecture
> >       • #374 Protocols in Figure 2 (2 by mwelzl, tfpauly) Architecture
> >       • #258 Do we need a terminology section in arch? (1 by britram)
> Architecture discuss
> >       • #145 Draft should point at implementations somewhere (1 by
> tfpauly) Implementation ready for text
> >       • #150 Add Unidirectional Streams for Multicast / Source and Sink
> support (1 by MaxF12) API Implementation ready for text
> >       • #154 Structure of implementation draft (1 by tfpauly)
> Implementation
> >       • #177 Privacy considerations section (1 by tfpauly) API
> Implementation ready for text
> >       • #299 TAPS ARCH - Textual review to notes (1 by tfpauly)
> Architecture
> >       • #45 Do we need to make state storage explicit in the
> architecture and API? (1 by britram) API Architecture ready for text
> >       • #312 Detailed author review of Arch text for -03 to prepare -04
> (1 by tfpauly) Architecture ready for text
> >       • #324 Add explicit protocol selection. (1 by britram) API ready
> for text
> >       • #334 Consider message send API that takes padding policy as
> input (1 by britram) API future work
> >       • #357 Default values (1 by britram) API discuss ready for text
> >       • #364 Update wording where interface to security protocol implies
> racing/abstraction (1 by theri)
> >       • #365 Architecture: Editorial comments (1 by britram) Architecture
> >       • #249 API needs a way to handle "STARTTLS" (1 by britram) API
> Architecture discuss
> > 25 issues closed:
> >
> >       • #384 Experimental cost property: cost preference API discuss
> >       • #150 Add Unidirectional Streams for Multicast / Source and Sink
> support API Implementation ready for text
> >       • #154 Structure of implementation draft Implementation
> >       • #145 Draft should point at implementations somewhere
> Implementation ready for text
> >       • #382 Multicast impact on architecture? Architecture
> >       • #365 Architecture: Editorial comments Architecture ready for text
> >       • #374 Protocols in Figure 2 Architecture
> >       • #324 Add explicit protocol selection. API ready for text
> >       • #206 Define the server-side equivalent of racing API
> Architecture ready for text
> >       • #309 Clarification on queued receives API ready for text
> >       • #178 Architecture privacy and security considerations
> Architecture ready for text
> >       • #347 "Events" versus "Callbacks" for security-relevant
> asynchrony API Architecture ready for text
> >       • #300 Add property for address privacy API ready for text
> >       • #303 More expressive multipath transport property API ready for
> text
> >       • #334 Consider message send API that takes padding policy as
> input API future work
> >       • #375 Multiple receives convenience feature API discuss
> >       • #299 TAPS ARCH - Textual review to notes Architecture
> >       • #45 Do we need to make state storage explicit in the
> architecture and API? API Architecture ready for text
> >       • #282 Implementation should describe how to handle proxies/TOR
> Implementation discuss help wanted
> >       • #357 Default values API discuss ready for text
> >       • #306 Failure of unsatisfiable configurations API
> >       • #270 Add re-initiate() call for voluntary connection migration
> API future work
> >       • #258 Do we need a terminology section in arch? Architecture
> discuss
> >       • #249 API needs a way to handle "STARTTLS" API Architecture
> discuss
> >       • #312 Detailed author review of Arch text for -03 to prepare -04
> Architecture ready for text
> > Pull requests
> >
> > ietf-tapswg/api-drafts (+13/-11/💬11)
> > 13 pull requests submitted:
> >
> >       • #383 Editorial comments, fixes #365 (by theri)
> >       • #381 Move Transport Properties text and close #373 (by philsbln)
> >       • #380 Add clarification on Multicast receive to API (by MaxF12)
> >       • #379 TAPS allows you to dynamically choose protocol stacks, we
> should say so. (by britram)
> >       • #378 closes #324 (by mwelzl)
> >       • #377 Partial receives are not reordering preferences; fix #309
> (by britram)
> >       • #376 Add text for server-side "racing" (by tfpauly)
> >       • #372 Address privacy property, #300 (by tfpauly)
> >       • #370 Add multipath property enumeration (by tfpauly)
> >       • #369 add dates to references, and clean up spurious ones (by
> britram)
> >       • #368 be explicit and careful about callbacks vs events; fix #347
> (by britram)
> >       • #361 fixes for a few nits (by GrumpyOldTroll)
> >       • #360 udp multicast receive (#150) (by GrumpyOldTroll)
> > 3 pull requests received 11 new comments:
> >
> >       • #360 udp multicast receive (#150) (9 by MaxF12, philsbln,
> mwelzl, theri)
> >       • #378 closes #324 (1 by britram)
> >       • #380 Add clarification on Multicast receive to API (1 by
> philsbln)
> > 11 pull requests merged:
> >
> >       • #380 Add clarification on Multicast receive to API
> >       • #383 Editorial comments, fixes #365
> >       • #379 TAPS allows you to dynamically choose protocol stacks, we
> should say so.
> >       • #376 Add text for server-side "racing"
> >       • #377 Partial receives are not reordering preferences; fix #309
> >       • #368 be explicit and careful about callbacks vs events; fix #347
> >       • #370 Add multipath property enumeration
> >       • #372 Address privacy property, #300
> >       • #369 add dates to references, and clean up spurious ones
> >       • #360 udp multicast receive (#150)
> >       • #361 fixes for a few nits
> > Repositories tracked by this digest:
> >
> >       • https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts
> > _______________________________________________
> > Taps mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
>
> _______________________________________________
> Taps mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
>
_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps

Reply via email to