Hi, Regarding Kyle’s review, I think this should fall under the heading of “issue review”. I’m planning to look at these again soon, addressing easy ones in a PR, removing points of agreement… and whatever remains, unless some bigger things warrant a list discussion, I thought I'd post as issues. Clearly, “Issue review” is an important agenda item and it could take long. It’s a good, structured way to discuss things IMHO.
Cheers, Michael > On Mar 25, 2020, at 3:24 PM, Aaron Falk <[email protected]> wrote: > > What shall we discuss in April? How about: > > Normative language in -arch > Issue review > Some questions: > > Is it timely to seek a deep review of -implementation? > Are there open issues to discuss from Kyle’s review of -interface? > What else? > > --aaron > > _______________________________________________ > Taps mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
_______________________________________________ Taps mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
