Hi ! I may not know enough about IETF strategy and time planning… but - in principle: I guess it would be useful to avoid getting the same comments twice. Right now, for -interface (-arch is almost done?!) we have only a handful of PRs to land (mostly easy cases, it seems to me), and a good number of open issues which are 90% editorial and fast to handle (assigned to Brian).
=> shouldn't we wait for these updates to happen, and then ask for such broader review? To me, this would mean: “wait for the interim and a bit”. Cheers, Michael > On Jun 4, 2021, at 8:28 PM, Theresa Enghardt <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear TAPS, > > Aaron and I were talking about requesting some early reviews on the > Architecture and Interface drafts. > > I would like to go ahead and request reviews by the Transport Area Review > team (TSVART) and the Security Area Directorate (SECDIR). > > Any objections, or would anyone like to discuss this at the interim next week? > > If I don't hear anything by next Tuesday June 8th, 8 am PT, I'll go ahead and > click the button. > > Best, > Theresa > > _______________________________________________ > Taps mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps _______________________________________________ Taps mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
