Hi Michael,
Agreed.
We had a recent change to the Security interface, too, and perhaps this
change should be included in the version that SecDir reviews.
So perhaps best to publish a new revision of the interface doc soon and
then ask the for the reviews on that version.
I'll bring this up at the interim then.
Best,
Theresa
On 6/4/21 11:55 AM, Michael Welzl wrote:
Hi !
I may not know enough about IETF strategy and time planning… but - in
principle: I guess it would be useful to avoid getting the same comments twice.
Right now, for -interface (-arch is almost done?!) we have only a handful of
PRs to land (mostly easy cases, it seems to me), and a good number of open
issues which are 90% editorial and fast to handle (assigned to Brian).
=> shouldn't we wait for these updates to happen, and then ask for such broader
review?
To me, this would mean: “wait for the interim and a bit”.
Cheers,
Michael
On Jun 4, 2021, at 8:28 PM, Theresa Enghardt <[email protected]> wrote:
Dear TAPS,
Aaron and I were talking about requesting some early reviews on the
Architecture and Interface drafts.
I would like to go ahead and request reviews by the Transport Area Review team
(TSVART) and the Security Area Directorate (SECDIR).
Any objections, or would anyone like to discuss this at the interim next week?
If I don't hear anything by next Tuesday June 8th, 8 am PT, I'll go ahead and
click the button.
Best,
Theresa
_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
