I'm glad we did this work, but the energy here has gotten pretty low and I wonder if it's worth doing extensions if there's exactly 1 deployment of any significance.
Furthermore, if the only thing people are excited about is a QUIC mapping, I'd rather we just do it in QUICWG than have the overhead of a WG for this. On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 12:26 PM Devon H. O'Dell <dhobsd= [email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Most of my questions / comments / contributions have been about > discoverability / configuration, and I wondered if there'd be interest in > exploring the policy and configuration space for Transport Services. I'm > thinking along the lines of APIs for configuration tools to manage or > discover policy (e.g. enumerate local endpoints, gather properties, collect > / set resolver configurations). My apologies for having missed the last > several meetings, but would love to discuss this at the next interim. > > Kind regards, > > --dho > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 11:35 AM Reese Enghardt <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Dear TAPS, >> >> As we are moving towards finishing the three core documents, the next >> step will be to recharter or conclude. >> >> We have talked about possible further milestones related to mapping >> documents, and we have a few related issues on the Github >> ( >> https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3Amappings). >> >> >> >> However, we have not seen much activity on this topic since IETF 113, >> and we have no related currently active documents. >> >> I wanted to give you a heads-up that, given this state, the chairs are >> wondering if it'll be time to conclude TAPS once the core documents have >> made their way to the RFC Editor, unless we see evidence of substantial >> interest and activity regarding further milestones. >> >> Nothing has been decided yet, and we will be happy to discuss this >> question. >> >> TAPS is not meeting at IETF 116, but we can consider scheduling a >> virtual interim meeting or a WG meeting at IETF 117 if we have content >> for a fruitful discussion. >> >> Please let me know your thoughts. >> >> Best, >> Reese >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Taps mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps >> > _______________________________________________ > Taps mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps >
_______________________________________________ Taps mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
