On Sat, 23 Aug 2008, Frank Niessink wrote: > 2008/8/23 Jerome Laheurte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Agreed. I'll create the folder after I'm done with the attachment >> branch. In case you didn't see the commit messages yet, I'm making the >> attachments "regular" domain objects, with categories and notes, and >> a dedicated viewer. The only thing that bugs me is that >> "subattachment" isn't a nice word, I think I'll go with 'child >> attachment' :) > > You mean you want to make attachments composite? Does that make sense? > Why not make it a non-composite domain object, like effort?
Though I agree children attachment are sometwhat strange, I'd really like to have notes in attachments. Cheers Jérôme
