On Sun, 24 Aug 2008, Jerome Laheurte wrote: > On Sat, 23 Aug 2008, Frank Niessink wrote: > >> You mean you want to make attachments composite? Does that make sense? >> Why not make it a non-composite domain object, like effort? > > Though I agree children attachment are sometwhat strange, I'd really > like to have notes in attachments.
And now I realize a NoteOwner is not necessarily composite.
