Hi Stian,

Cheers for clearing this up, my understanding of the nuances berween
Taverna 1 and 2 are somewhat limited.  I don't beleive the annotation
chains in Taverna 2.2 are extracted by myExperiment, as the Ruby Gem has
not been updated to do this.  It is certainly interesting information
that we should be extracting.

Regards

David Newman

 
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 10:52 +0100, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 13:05, David R Newman <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Bear in mind that a workflow may have more than one version.  Assuming
> > that the same file is modified to produce each new version, each
> > workflow version will a dataflow with the same identifier.  The above
> > query can be modified to return all workflow versions that use the same
> > identifier for their top level dataflow.
> 
> Just a minor correction.. Taverna 2 assigns a new workflow ID whenever
> you do a change, so unless you upload the exact same .t2flow file the
> second time to myExperiment, the second "myExperiment version" would
> have a different dataflow ID.
> 
> The main reason that we have to change the ID is that we can't easily
> tell if a change is a minor or fundamental change to the workflow. We
> also don't know if this is a further edit of the same 'work in
> progress' or a fork. Therefore you could have many different workflows
> which 'once' had the same ID.
> 
> Taverna 1 did the opposite, it assigned a unique LSID when you
> constructed a workflow, and this was persisted until the user clicked
> 'New ID'. You will therefore find many Taverna 1 workflows on
> myExperiment with the same LSID, which are fundamentally different,
> but which just happen to have had a common starting point from say a
> tutorial workflow. As such this didn't work very well as a unique
> identifier, and we went for always assigning a new UUID in Taverna 2.
> 
> From Taverna 2.2 we keep the old UUIDs as an annotation chain inside
> the .t2flow file, but I don't think myExperiment extract these yet.
> From this ancestry you could find relations between workflows, such as
> them having a common parent 5 generations ago.
> 
> annotations><annotation_chain_2_2
> encoding="xstream"><net.sf.taverna.t2.annotation.AnnotationChainImpl
> xmlns="">
>   <annotationAssertions>
>     <net.sf.taverna.t2.annotation.AnnotationAssertionImpl>
>       <annotationBean
> class="net.sf.taverna.t2.annotation.annotationbeans.IdentificationAssertion">
>         <identification>f3c5bdf3-b211-4bf9-9bfe-b64a42eed837</identification>
>       </annotationBean>
>       <date>2010-07-07 10:31:03.238 BST</date>
>       <creators />
>       <curationEventList />
>     </net.sf.taverna.t2.annotation.AnnotationAssertionImpl>
>   </annotationAssertions>
> </net.sf.taverna.t2.annotation.AnnotationChainImpl></annotation_chain_2_2><annotation_chain_2_2
> encoding="xstream"><net.sf.taverna.t2.annotation.AnnotationChainImpl
> xmlns="">
>   <annotationAssertions>
>     <net.sf.taverna.t2.annotation.AnnotationAssertionImpl>
>       <annotationBean
> class="net.sf.taverna.t2.annotation.annotationbeans.IdentificationAssertion">
>         <identification>0af6757b-0efa-4622-880f-61d74f75c6a3</identification>
>       </annotationBean>
>       <date>2010-07-07 10:31:26.347 BST</date>
>       <creators />
>       <curationEventList />
>     </net.sf.taverna.t2.annotation.AnnotationAssertionImpl>
>   </annotationAssertions>
> </net.sf.taverna.t2.annotation.AnnotationChainImpl></annotation_chain_2_2>
> (..)
> 
> In SCUFL2 we'll probably note these as something like
> 
> <http://ns.taverna.org.uk/2010/workflow/0af6757b-0efa-4622-880f-61d74f75c6a3>
> scufl2:basedOn
>    
> <http://ns.taverna.org.uk/2010/workflow/f3c5bdf3-b211-4bf9-9bfe-b64a42eed837>
> .
> 
> 
> 
> > As a side issue, I had a number of people comment to me that it would be
> > useful yo have an ID field in the myExperiment RDF to save need to
> > perform a regex on URIs to get out the ID number.  Would people actually
> > find this useful or would they rarely need to perform such a regex?
> 
> I don't think you need to use regex-filtering to match exact strings.
> As previously mentioned, I had success with:
> 
> PREFIX xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#>
> PREFIX dcterms: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/>
> PREFIX mebase: <http://rdf.myexperiment.org/ontologies/base/>
> PREFIX mecomp: <http://rdf.myexperiment.org/ontologies/components/>
> 
> SELECT ?dataflow,?version,?workflow WHERE {
>  ?dataflow dcterms:identifier
> '206f6ca5-083c-4314-8ff8-8a8c542e1160'^^xsd:string .
>  ?version mecomp:executes-dataflow ?dataflow .
>  ?workflow mebase:has-version ?version
> }
> 
> 
> -- 
> Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team
> School of Computer Science
> The University of Manchester
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
> What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
> Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
> _______________________________________________
> taverna-hackers mailing list
> [email protected]
> Web site: http://www.taverna.org.uk
> Mailing lists: http://www.taverna.org.uk/about/contact-us/
> Developers Guide: http://www.taverna.org.uk/developers/


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
taverna-hackers mailing list
[email protected]
Web site: http://www.taverna.org.uk
Mailing lists: http://www.taverna.org.uk/about/contact-us/
Developers Guide: http://www.taverna.org.uk/developers/

Reply via email to