David R Newman wrote: > Hi Stian, > > Cheers for clearing this up, my understanding of the nuances berween > Taverna 1 and 2 are somewhat limited. I don't beleive the annotation > chains in Taverna 2.2 are extracted by myExperiment, as the Ruby Gem has > not been updated to do this. It is certainly interesting information > that we should be extracting.
Just for clarity, although the UUID is changed whenever the workflow is edited, the UUID is only saved in the annotation chain when the workflow is saved or run. > Regards Alan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ taverna-hackers mailing list [email protected] Web site: http://www.taverna.org.uk Mailing lists: http://www.taverna.org.uk/about/contact-us/ Developers Guide: http://www.taverna.org.uk/developers/
