On 04/10/2010 23:00, Daniel Blezek wrote: > Hi, Hello,
> I’ve searched a bit, but couldn’t find the answer to this question, > hopefully, it is an easy one. > > We would like to evaluate Taverna as a tool to build image processing > workflows. We have a number of command line programs that handle the > steps we take in processing the images. I was successful in using Opal ( > https://pragma.sdsc.edu/software/opal/) to “wrap” the programs and > expose them as web services. Before going too far down this path, I > wanted to evaluate the user-friendliness of Taverna+Opal. > > It seems as though I have to define the web services one at a time, and > each gets a line in the “Service panel” of Taverna. This seems rather > tedious and adds a lot of redundant junk to that panel. However, I see > other stock services such as Soaplab have a nice directory structure, > and multiple services defined with one line in the panel. Is this > possible to do using WSDL? or do I need to use Soaplab for my services? You get a sub-tree for each WSDL and then one line within that sub-tree for each operation described in the WSDL. Is it possible to get Opal to include descriptions of several tools within a single WSDL? If not, then you could either post-process the several WSDLs to combine into one WSDL, or switch to using something like Soaplab. > Thanks, > -dan Alan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb _______________________________________________ taverna-users mailing list [email protected] [email protected] Web site: http://www.taverna.org.uk Mailing lists: http://www.taverna.org.uk/about/contact-us/
