Hello, >> send the certificate during the connection, so there is nothing to add. But >> if you can get this certificate other way, e.g. getting it from a provider >> via the website or by email, then you can add it.
> Surely, the fact that TB rejected the cert meant that it was sent by > the server. Yes, this was also my point - if TB sees it as self-signed, I would also suppose it must have SEEN IT (in order to check it) and thus it must have been sent (also, I would hardly expect the server qio try to establish a TLS session without sending a certificate). The log even says so. I wonder if there is a substantial difference between our and Maxims understanding of whether a certificate was "been sent"? Did Maxim mean the CAs certificate has not been sent, rather than the server's one? In a self-signed cert there is no CA in the story...so just as in Firefox, I'd expect to be able to just say "I trust the server's cert, please add it to the trusted list" without having to change to the address book and look for where to ass it myself. -- Best regards, Viktor Kabelac mailto:kabe...@rar.cz ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 5.0.22.1 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
