4/13/2012 11:10 AM Hi Gleason,
On 4/13/2012 Gleason wrote: >> Double-click.. Renders great in my browser of choice which is also >> best equipped to deal with security issues. G> The point of TB having internal rendering being that browsers are G> especially vulnerable to security issues. Especially IE. The more G> widely used they are, the more vulnerable they are. G> In my case, the emails that are most likely to be guilty of security G> offenses go straight to junk and are never viewed. While leaving html G> email from my legitimate correspondents viewable and renderable. The G> better the rendering the betting I like it. I understand that there G> are folks out there who get no legitimate html email. I'm not sure how G> they do it... True that browsers are more vulnerable in their native configuration. However they can be configured to be quite protective with readily available & proven tools to do this. Additionally, when the user double-clicks the HTML icon in the message they are aware they are taking a purposeful action that has the potential for unwanted results. No system will ever be able to effectively perform actions that are the users' responsibility without the user losing freedom and control. - -- Paul The Bat! v.4.2.44.2 on Windows 7 Pro 64 bit 6.1.7601 No IMAP No OTFE ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 5.1.0.1 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
