Hi,
On Tuesday, May 15, 2001, 10:31:43 AM, Philippe Gouillou wrote:
> I've just sent a mail to myself to test and compare the headers. You'll
> find hereafter the headers for both.
> The difference is :
> Received :
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> Content-Disposition: inline
> AND
> Content-Type: text/richtext; name="cvyK.rtf"
> Content-Description: cvyK.rtf
> Content-Disposition: inline; filename="cvyK.rtf"
Here's the problem: "Content-Disposition: inline"
> Sent by TB! (test) :
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> AND
> Content-Type: application/msword; name="citations.rtf"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
> Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="citations.rtf"
> So TB! send correctly RTF. But wouldn't it be possible to TB! to
> automatically detect when it's RTF file ?
Not really. TB! does what it has been told: display the attachment
inline. The only thing we could ask for is an option to save such
message parts.
The culprit in your sample is Yahoo, not TB!
Regards,
Markus
--
Using The Bat! 1.53 Beta/5 under Windows NT 4.0 Build
1381 Service Pack 5
--
______________________________________________________
Archives : <http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com>
Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
