Hi Peter,

Tuesday, May 15, 2001, 1:11:21 PM, you wrote:

PG>>     The difference is :

PG>>     Received :
PG>>       Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
PG>>       Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
PG>>       Content-Disposition: inline
PG>>      AND
PG>>       Content-Type: text/richtext; name="cvyK.rtf"
PG>>       Content-Description: cvyK.rtf
PG>>       Content-Disposition: inline; filename="cvyK.rtf"
>                                ^^^^^^
>                                THERE the problem is located :-(

PG>>     So TB! send correctly RTF. But wouldn't it be possible to TB! to
PG>>     automatically detect when it's RTF file ?

The problem are also if there a no inline:

-----
--Multipart Fri Jan 12 11:04:13 2001
Content-Type: text/richtext
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
-----
This entrys also do not work with TB!


The Problem are that TB! detect the "TEXT" from "TEXT/RICHTEXT" and
decide to display this in the text viewer. That's wrong design by TB!
and a Bug. (No IMHO here :-))

cu,
 Dirk

-- 
Using The Bat! 1.52 Beta/14 (S/N 12A1F196 / Educational) under Windows 95 4.0 Build 
1111  B

-- 
______________________________________________________
Archives   : <http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com>
Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

You are subscribed as : [email protected]


Reply via email to