Hello Alexander,

12 Dec 2001, 2:57:02, you wrote:

JW>> Why bad?

> Why plain-text big bases is suxx, and SQL rulez?! In terms of speed...
> �onsequent reading work better on plain text, but for tasks with
> random access (surfing in mailbox is only example) always, more than
> 20 years used other principles - indexes, direct access, what can't be
> done in text-file (in common)

The fact is that Becky is much much faster in searching the message
base. I measured that Becky is at least 3 times faster. I did find out
that The Bat gets slower when the message base gets larger. Becky uses
indexes that point to the 'as-plain-text-stored' messages. Becky
simply uses an efficient and intelligent way of storing. F.e.: you
don't have to compress the message base every time again like in The
Bat....

I recommend you to test this yourself. You'll be amazed.

-- 
Best regards,
 Marc                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
_________________________________________________________
Archives   : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Beta: 1.54 beta/15
Wish List  : http://wish.thebat.dutaint.com

Reply via email to