Hello Nick, 12. marec 2002, 17:26:24, you wrote:
NA> Thanks Marck. Actually, I do like WinRar 3.0 and might just purchase the NA> product. I'm kind of fooling around with it now, and it's compression NA> ratio is fantastic. I am able to RAR up a few Folders I never seem to NA> use much and am saving MB's of space on the paltry 2.1 GB HDD of mine. Before rushing, may I suggest you to test 7-zip <http://www.7-zip.org/>, which is excellent free packer, which achieves even greater compression ratio than WinRAR 3. If you don't look into great protection (I'm talking about protection when archive file itself is damaged - RAR is superior here), then 7z might be even better choice (The Bat! 1.54beta47b executable compressed with 7z and converted to self-extracting archive is still 80kB smaller than original RAR file. -- Jernej Simoncic, [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www2.arnes.si/~sopjsimo/ ICQ: 26266467 [The Bat! v1.54 Beta/46 on Windows 98 4.10.2222. A ] Any stone in your boot always migrates against the pressure gradient to exactly the point of most pressure. -- Barber's Second Law of Backpacking -- _________________________________________________________ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Wish List : https://bt.ritlabs.com/ BugTraq : https://bt.ritlabs.com/
