Hello Kenneth!

On Tuesday, March 12, 2002 at 7:07:44 PM you wrote:

> However, if the company is so concerned about saving the bandwidth
> cost, then perhaps they should go private . . .

Nothing against the pros and cons Maxxx and you mention or
acknowledge. I just think that all in all public testing may not be as
efficient as closed one, but more effective.

Certain problems are - for every software/hardware - system dependent.
Consider the memory leak for the RTV, it couldn't be detected,
according to Alexander, within RITLabs because Win9x isn't used there.
Chances are that a closed beta cycle would be held with computer
versed people like Marck or Peter Palmreuther who work in computing
using any colour of WinNT.

Some years ago, when Opera was a very small company, they had public
betas. Sometime around the 3.6 versions they decided to close beta
testing leading to the infamous 4.x series. A few weeks ago they
returned to public testing - although slightly enhanced through using
their own news server. And Opera was very delighted about the results,
in quality and quantity. A lot of bugs and glitches could be
identified and worked out that couldn't have been found that easily in
a closed circuit. As an example I just cite some printing difficulties
with certain printers (all of the HP kind).

My brandnew Kyocera laser printer has some very stupid glitches - like
not being able to print correctly from CorelDraw. Some of them should
have been found in closed betas (corrupt driver on CD, a software that
works on some systems but not on others, very erratic), others are
definitely an environmental problem, like the ability to work
correctly with FinePrint or ClickBook.*

Just my two cents.


*BTW, if anyone has difficulties printing PDF's from Acrobat Reader,
check "Print as graphic".



-- 
Dierk Haasis
http://www.Write4U.de
http://Interest.Write4U.de/pongo

PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys

The Bat 1.54 Beta/47 on Windows 95 4.0 1212 C

Pray: To ask that the laws of the universe be annulled in behalf of a
single petitioner confessedly unworthy. (Ambrose Bierce)


-- 
_________________________________________________________
Archives   : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wish List  : https://bt.ritlabs.com/
BugTraq    : https://bt.ritlabs.com/

Reply via email to