Dear group, Tuesday, March 12, 2002, 7:10:23 PM, you wrote:
>> However, if the company is so concerned about saving the bandwidth >> cost, then perhaps they should go private . . . <snip> DH> Some years ago, when Opera was a very small company, they had public DH> betas. Sometime around the 3.6 versions they decided to close beta DH> testing leading to the infamous 4.x series. A few weeks ago they DH> returned to public testing - although slightly enhanced through using DH> their own news server. And Opera was very delighted about the results, DH> in quality and quantity. A lot of bugs and glitches could be DH> identified and worked out that couldn't have been found that easily in DH> a closed circuit. As an example I just cite some printing difficulties DH> with certain printers (all of the HP kind). <snip> Have to agree with this. I have been using the Opera 6.02 beta 1056 and have never seen Opera as a more usuable browser. Previously, Opera 6, IMO, was utterly useless because of a few small, but fundamental, glitches. I hope Ritlabs stick with public beta testing for the 1.x and 2.x versions of this wonderful email client. -- Best regards, Ben Briscoe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- _________________________________________________________ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Wish List : https://bt.ritlabs.com/ BugTraq : https://bt.ritlabs.com/
