-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 @ 13:21:41 -0600 [ Mon, 25 Mar 2002], Joseph N. [JN] thoughtfully wrote the following: ... JN> My experience is that one is better off using GnuPG through the JN> GPGshell tray program than with The Bat's plug-in. Reliability is JN> better and the options are greater.
The possibilities are greater if you use both together, taking advantage of each of their strengths. In this way, I actually much prefer using GPG to PGP at present. My only problem is the key auto-retrieval problem that GPG has when run on NT-based systems. JN> I found some of TB's menu options didn't produce with GnuPG, Yes. The plugin isn't that developed to include these components and I suspect this is so because the existence of GPG Shell is known. :-) JN> including poor key management. You can't manage keys via the TB! plugin. You have to use the GPG CLI. JN> The tray options do not produce exta work, just extra control. Well, mostly yes. However, if you're in the habit of signing a lot of messages in a predictable fashion, nothing beats setting this up to be automated and forgetting about it, especially if you use multiple keys. GPG Shell doesn't offer this automation, but TB!'s plugin does. :-) - -- Allie C Martin -- List Moderator PGPKey - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ____________________________________________ [MUA: TB! v1.60 (*) OS: Windows XP 5.1.2600] _ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6-2 (MingW32) iEYEARECAAYFAjyfid4ACgkQV8nrYCsHF+LpLgCfU5rFRl83EvlYDXXtZUdWGEyV TEgAoLwCG7axj9IgEUJNGe0BGYuNw2gw =h2Fz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _________________________________________________________ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs/Wishes: https://bt.ritlabs.com/
