On Wednesday 26 June 2002 01:55, Tony Boom wrote: > T> This may indeed be true, but would you care to elaborate? > > Not sure where to start really. I can only speak about the requirements > and facilities I want from a client and It's mainly in the filtering > area that Becky falls way behind TB.
Yeah everyone having their main concern :-) For me, Becky! makes me not productive every morning, because the POP retrieval message not multi threaded nor pipelining. Everymorning when arrive in office I get at least 1000 messages, while downloading Becky! will wait till all messages finish to download before starting filter process then new messages comes up in folder, hence I can not start to response any new message. While at home, I check mail every 3-days sometimes 6-days, this more worst because I must start download Friday night and can using it Saturday morning. I have compare the speed of download while using TB! 1.53d (dial up connection 33 Kbps, around 7500 messages, 15 MB size), Becky lag around 50 messages per half hours compare to TB!, no wonder I feel not productive using Becky! at home :-( > Becky may be perfect for you depending on what you want from it. For me > though it's worse than useless. :-) -- syafril ------- Syafril Hermansyah<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _________________________________________________________ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs/Wishes: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
