Hi Bruno, What can I say? When you're right, you're right. ;-)
Monday, March 24, 2003, 3:15:20 PM, Bruno wrote: >> Saturday, March 22, 2003, 8:57:30 PM, DRS wrote: DRS>>> On Saturday, March 22, 2003, 1:59:17 PM, Vincent wrote: V>>>> Indeed, I already spotted that setting. It says 'suggested split 100 K bytes', V>>>> and is unticked. DRS>>> Sorry for the "busy" work Vincent but, at this point, I'm just testing all DRS>>> waters as to your problem. Could you update your The_Bat! beta to versions DRS>>> 6 or 7 and see what happens or have you been that route already? BF> Please use the search feature of the mailing list archive. This saves a BF> lot of time and space when dealing with old issues. This BF> message-cutting problem was present in TB beta 4 and was reproduced by a BF> number of people. The problem was most certainly with TB and only took BF> about a minute of testing to prove. Sent-mail messages and drafts were BF> cut at save/send-time. The problem as far as I recall, was only reported BF> using the new Windows-Style editor. It was the reason I stopped using BF> the beta copies until a few of these more serious problems had a chance BF> to be eliminated. BF> I hope TBBETA doesn't turn flip into the same signal:noise ratio as BF> TBUDL. I had to turn off that list (for reading purposes it makes much BF> more sense to use the web-based archive search) BF> I'm curious.. Why do so many people keep quoting with initials ON, yet BF> they don't modify their introduction line to include initials or name of BF> the person they're quoting? For a mailing list, having "you wrote..." BF> is pretty useless. BF> Bruno BF> Looking forward to the next beta announcement. -- Best regards, Vincent mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 1.63b7 | "Using TBBETA" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
