Hello, Mark. You wrote 27.09.2003 @ 17:44 in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> using mailer The Bat! (v2.00.6) Educational
MA> I have just installed 0.4fm and I have noticed a couple of odd MA> behaviors. MA> 1. Messages sent to the Junk Mail folder don't appear to be adding MA> themselves to the SPAM frequency dictionary. How did you recognize it? If you just "Mark as Junk" and go to the "information"'s page of the filter, you will see the same number as before. Actually the it is only "marking" action, not "learning". But - the actual learning will begin automatically after half a minute after you make your last "mark as" action - or after you receive the last letter (because the same "mark as" action is called from regarding procedure based on the grade). This learning process is asynchronous. Usually it takes about a minute to be completed - and then the regarding base will be reloaded. So, if you "mark as..." some letter, you will see the counter changed after about at least half a minute - actually after 1-1.5 minutes. If you receive a junk letter (which was automatically moved to "junk folder", or which you "mark as Junk" by button, you may check the quantity of junk mails in the base after minute or two - but not immediately. (note, that in 2.00.15 you even don't need to manually move the letter to the junk mail - because it will be done together with "mark as" action - IMHO this is good new feature of 2.00.15). MA> 2. When I run "Mark as Junk" on multiple items the confirmation MA> message no longer seems to return the right number. Instead it always MA> says "1 message processed" if one or more were re-classified as Spam. Yeah, it is a small cosmetic issue. I tried to cause the filter to return a "good" result - in the sense of CP-API - if the filter with "mark as" action will recognize that the message is already present in the appropriate part of the base (i.e. if you "mark as junk" the letter which was already marked as junk before, and in the opposite case), it will return a negative answer, and The Bat! will show that "0 letters was processed...". This is only cosmetic message - of course, I can always return a "positive" result, and it is only small cosmetic feature. But it still be a small bug in this feature. I'll fix it. MA> Keep up the good work though. BayesIt is starting to look very good MA> indeed. Thanks' for feedback! -- Sincerely, Alexey. Using TB 2.00.15 on WinXP Pro SP1 (2600), spelling by ORFO2002 (CSAPI) ..with Kaspersky Antivirus Plugin (ver 3.5 Gold) & antispam filter BayesIt! 0.4fm mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 2.00.06 | "Using TBBETA" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
