Krzysztof Kudlacik, [KK] wrote: KK> According to this logic I have to explode on mine in oreder to KK> lern simple truth that walking on mine field is not healthy way of KK> life (of die) ;)
I think you may be overstating the issue a tad. :) Prior to using VF's you knew that hitting delete would delete the message and send it to the trash or wherever you configure your delete command to do (you know that you can now specify what deleting does, right?) Now, if you know beforehand, as you now do, that deleting a message in a VF deletes the actual message, why do you feel like you're in a mine field? :) - If you reply to a message in a VF, the actual message is flagged as replied. - If you flag a message in a VF, the actual message is flagged. - If you mark a message in a VF as read or unread, the actual message is correspondingly marked as read or unread. - If you forward a message in a VF, the actual message is flagged as forwarded. - If you change a message in a VF's colour group, the actual messages colour group is correspondingly changed. There's a pattern, isn't there? :) So, if you delete a message in a VF, what do you think will happen then?? :) This is why I don't think it's misleading. In fact, if the actual message were not correspondingly deleted as happens with everything else you choose to do with a message in a VF, it would be unusual. A VF gives you the opportunity to handle a message via a different container. What you do to the message from that container actually happens to the message. -- -=[ Allie ]=- (List Moderator and fellow end-user) PGPKeys: http://key.ac-martin.com Running The Bat! v2.10 on WinXP Pro (SP1)
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________________ Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
