Hello Thomas, At 12:57 AM on Saturday, May 29, 2004 it seems you posted the following to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in regards to VF:
> On Fri, 28 May 2004 18:16:37 -0400 GMT (29/05/2004, 05:16 +0700 > GMT), Jan Rifkinson wrote: >>> The advantage with flags is that I don't need to set anything up. I >>> hit crtl-G, and it's there. I have ansered the message, I hit crtl-G >>> again, and the message is not flagged any more. > JR> You could do the same with a color assignment I believe. > I could set it up, yes. Create colour groups, create shortcut to > assign / unassign the colour group, etc. The beauty with flags is that > I don't have to set up anything. See the difference? Of course I see the difference. <duh> I think you miss my point but that's ok as you say, Val9 is working on solution. >>> Or maybe we are misunderstanding each other: I have only one VF, and >>> that is for message not answered right away. So there is no need for a >>> second VF at all. > JR> I was only suggesting the 2nd one as an alternative of > JR> <enter> all those msgs that have to be answered after research > JR> especially if there is the powere loss you mentioned in your > JR> original post. > It would decrease efficiency to do both things. Flagging and using a > VF is optimal, and I know 9Val is working it it, so I have no worries > and am not looking for a work-around. [...] Sorry to have bothered, then. Have a nice wknd. -- Jan Rifkinson Ridgefield, CT USA TB! V2.11 Beta/8/W2K_SP3 ICQ 41116329 ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 2.11 Beta/8 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
