Hello all, Saturday, August 28, 2004, Peter Ouwehand wrote: MM>> there was no need to prepare rar file for revision only,
> There's confusion... I don't think. MM>> look to info about this version, time and date of revision MM>> compilation is there. > Not sure what you mean here, not really relevant also IMHO. Nevermind. MM>> Maxim sent changelog for this revision, because somebody thought, it MM>> is a good idea to announce it. > Then it would be useful when Maxim mentioned it is not an official beta > release. and all users who downloaded and installed it will downgrade after such information? I don't think. > Even Marck seems to be convinced it is an official release, the > list footer has changed to beta/8 (...) he could understand this, because Max sent changelog for it. > To RITLabs: Please use a consistent way to release public beta versions. Announcements from developers are not enough? When is not beta announced, it was not released. This is not clear? -- Bye Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat! http://www.thebat.cz Using the best The Bat! 2.13 "Lucky" Beta/8 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Notebook Acer, Pentium4-M 2.2 GHz, 512 MB RAM, ADSL line ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 2.13 Beta/8 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
