-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dear Marcus

On 10 September 2004 at 15:34:23 +0200 (which was 14:34 where I live) Marcus
Ohlstr�m graced us with these comments

< ... >

> Judging from this email and
> <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you have built your
> filters in a way they are not intended to be built.

:)

That is me.

> "Continue processing with other filters" decides whether the message
> should be carried on to other filters at _the same filter level_.

OK. This explains a lot

> Unticking this option in a subfilter only means no further subfilters of
> that particular parent filter should be processed. Whether the
> subsequent parent filters are processed or not is decided by whether
> "Continue processing with other filters" is ticked or not in the last
> matching filters _at the same filter level_.

Thanks for that I did missed that one.

>> Logic to me states the following.

>> Start filtering
>> Is message caught by Filter?
>> No ..:- Carry on to next filter
>> Yes .:- Carry out action as described by filter ?
>>         Is there any sub - filters ?
>>         No ..:- Stop (unless there is a continue processing flag)
>>         Yes .:- Is message caught by Sub filter ?
>>                 No ..:- Carry on to next sub filter
>>                 Yes .:- Carry out action of sub filter

> This is how it does work, with one exception. A subfilter never stops
> the processing of subsequent parent filters and it shouldn't.

Difference of opinion here, I can and work with it as it is

> See the 138 messages long discussion named "NFS: Big question for 9Val",

Thanks for the pointer.

> I'm sure you can find the messages you have lost in the archives.

:)

>> So what was happening before is that on the TBBeta filter it was
>> copying (not moving) and the message was still present in the in-box
>> when the Marck filter was hit. So a fresh copy was made into the Marck
>> folder and when the filtering was finished the message was deleted.

> This was a bug, confirmed and fixed by 9val. The NFS should not loose
> track of a message just because it has been moved (and doesn't anymore,
> which you have painfully noticed :-) and subsequent move actions moves
> the message again.

:)

< ... >

> Just a final comment on your message
> <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

>> I want each list to go into it's separate folder but each time I join
>> a list I don't want to have to change the top level filter to say this
>> is in a list and then create one for the list to move it.

> But this is how it works and I do believe this suites most of the users.

It suite me as long as I know about it.

> You apparently do not use parent filters to filter messages but rather
> to group filter together.

True, well some of the time.

> I can see the need for that too, but that is not what the concept of
> subfilters is there fore.

When you have a list as long as mine (and I am sure many people do) you do
need to group lists.

> Changing the way the NFS works would break it's current functionality.
> I'm sorry to say, but I think you will have to adjust.

I have. :)

> You could make your parent list filter trigger on a certain address book
> group and add all new mailing lists you join to this group. That way,
> you could still use the concept of subfilters to group filters together
> just like you want it. Not a perfect solution for you, but at least a
> solution that won't break the functionality of the NFS.

I do that as well for read messages but that is another story.

- --
 BFN,                      _______________________________________________
  David                   |     David  Elliott     |  Software  Engineer  |
 _________________________|  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  | PGP KeyID 0x650F4534 |
| What's another word for "thesaurus"?                                    |

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 6.5.8ckt
Comment: Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes?

iQA/AwUBQUGx5/mK8eZlD0U0EQI79QCg9CumjgcbUlzQxZzIk5zZbm1p9fwAni8h
0cbWnC9G3G5i7RD0cIN0vIbA
=XVNQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


________________________________________________________
 Current beta is 3.00.11 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Reply via email to