Hello Thorvald, On Saturday, September 18, 2004 at 8:31:49 AM Thorvald [TN] wrote:
TN> OK, finally, one mail from this list was tagged as SPAM. It was Keven TN> Coates' Mail on "Re: default browser changed". TN> I have no idea why his mail was classified as SPAM (despite using TB! TN> ;) and the others from this list aren't. Because his mail had boundaries set. See <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Guess someone should tell SpamAssassin and GMX the filter rule sets urgently need to be adjusted ... Therefore it would be good to hear from somebody @RITLabs about syntax of - X-Mailer header - and boundaries inserted by The Bat! for SA rules can be optimized to match all "legal" possibilities and maybe even hold valid in future versions of The Bat!. Dear programmers: what's the scheme you create boundary strings? Would be unlucky if somebody modifies the existing rule sets and excludes a possible pattern, just because nobody has perceived it "in the wild" yet. -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v3.0.0.15 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2) If this were an actual tagline, it would be funny. ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.00.15 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
