Hi Alexander, On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 05:42:27 +0600 (7:42 PM here), Alexander Leschinsky [AL] wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
KC>> I'm wondering if my sending messages directly through my Advanced KC>> Direct Remailer SMTP Server, rather than going through my ISP KC>> might be triggering a spam flag. AL> In this case ADR was single "bad boy" - it was classified as AL> spamware That's too bad, as I am no spammer and just sending normal e-mail. KC>> Perhaps the combination of The Bat! header plus mail not coming KC>> from a registered source is the culprit. AL> No. Combination of X-Mailer and MailMan's added message-part and AL> boundary. I think, batters have to ask Justin Mason (SA creator) AL> improve FORGED_* rule and additional check of presence any List-* AL> rules I suppose that is probably the only way to get things changed. I'd rather not have to disable the X-Mailer header. I would think its more of a corporate issue as TB is erroneously being categorized as Spamware, possibly affecting sales. -- Kevin Coates Dewitt, NY USA Using TB! v3.0.0.15 under Windows XP 5.1.2600 SP2 ________________________________________________________________ (see kludges for my pgp key)
pgpgZAU7lZTm0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.00.15 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
