Dear Michael, @17-Oct-2004, 14:42 -0700 (17-Oct 22:42 UK time) Michael L. Wilson [MLW] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to TBBETA:
MLW> Why do so many macros exist, when no one wants to see them used. MLW> BayesIT! has macros, Bayes Filter has macros, MyMAcros has MLW> macros, Zombie has MAcros, yet no one seems to use them and no MLW> one wants them included in messages. Why? I have 10 different cuts of meat in my freezer, 20 sandwich filling in the pantry, a dozen liqueur in my cocktail cabinet. I do not cook / eat / drink them all at once. They each have a time and a place. The multitude of macros have a time and a place. You can send yourself a scheduled message containing any and all of that information. Quite frankly, you're the only person in the world that really cares, wants or needs to know about your spam filter handling characteristics. What you certainly shouldn't do is flout list rules by overinflating your signature to 5 times the permitted length with information that means nothing to anybody but you. -- Cheers -- //.arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator and fellow end user TB! v3.0.2.1 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 '
pgpVouxg1cgOP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
