Hi, Raymund.
Raymund Thomas Tump wrote:
Looking at the messy quoting I'm glad staying with TB! :-)
:-) Yes, that is one thing TB! does do better.
Of course. I meant to mention that, but forgot. I understand that performance will not be as good with IMAP as with POP3.
I can't see why it should be as fast as POP3 as long as you only have the Inbox. (Well, that may not be a likely environment...) If you have many folders asking for new messages has to be done for every folder, but that is your own decision.
Well, that's the nature of IMAP: the ability to work with multiple folders on the server. The alternative is to leave everything in the inbox and sort messages with the client, but that seems to me to defeat the whole purpose of IMAP.
Did you try deleting your local cache for that folder/mailbox?
No, because I couldn't remember how. Can you remind me?
It's in the folder properties.
Oh, yes. Thanks. I keep looking for it in the folder's context menu, and of course it isn't there. Of course, Properties is listed in the context menu, but it takes an extra couple of clicks to clear the cache.
It seems that just about every time someone posts an IMAP problem, the recommendation is to clear the cache, so it would be nice if it were a little more straightforward.
Better yet would be if the developers could track down what's causing this frequent cache corruption. Other clients don't have that problem.
________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
