Tony Boom wrote:
Well, it *does* make sense not to use HTML. Given that most HTML rendering is done by the MS-supplied DLLs (maybe TB! has it's own, I do not know), I am really, really, not willing to see HTML-based e-mails...Problem is so many people on this and the other lists fought long and hard to keep html of any description out of TB! completely. So whatever html capability TB! has is a bonus whether wrong or right.
I'm not saying I agree one way or t'other but that's how it was.
We are getting one exploit after the other on this... last one is the IFRAME.
It is much prettier, and easy to read, I agree. I just wish MS had not completely blown HTML into a monster. In summary: HTML-based e-mail is not safe (and, by extension, Windows is also not safe).
________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.0.2.6 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
