Hi Avi, Saturday, February 12, 2005, 11:34:40 PM, you wrote: AY> Pardon me, Marck, but IMHO this is an entirely legitimate question for AY> a beta tester to ask. Also, IMHO, the "answer" you cite is no answer AY> at all - rather, it borders on being an insult.
I won't speak for Mark. Although the question may be legitimate. The point being made here is that this topic was a rather lengthy topic not that long ago. We did have some input I believe from Maxim - please correct me if I'm wrong here anyone - It basically boils down to there is a major re-write going on and rather than receive the beating over sending out a buggy beta. Like they have in the past. The team is waiting for a product worthy of beta testing. I've been on this list a long time. We beat them up pretty good for sending out buggy beta's. Telling them how to act responsibly. It appears they took our advice. IMHO we are getting the fruits of our ______ insert your own words here for the translations can be different... This of course is my perception of the immense conversations that have been had regarding this subject over the last several months. No disrespect was intended on my part. Just the facts as I saw them :) -- Cheers, Dean 3.0.2.10 Windows 2000 5 0 2195 ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
