On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 23:15:24 +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2005-02-15 at 20:31:41 Avi Yashar wrote: > > > Same here. "Secure to regular port" never worked for me. > > This could be a problem with your mail server, or just the way it is > configured. The easiest way to check this out is to telnet directly > to its port 25:
Wow! Okay, I will talk this over with a sysop in the office where I work. I had no idea that "Secure to regular port" could actually work with TB. For both my connections, I have always had to use "Secure to dedicated port", which actually works fine. I wonder, does it really make any great difference to me/anyone or my/anyone's usability if this setting is "Secure to dedicated port" rather than "Secure to regular port"? Presumably so, but I don't have the technical knowledge to distinguish. Anyway, thanks for the clarification, Dmitry. -- Avi Yashar Windows XP Pro SP2 and The Bat! Pro 3.0.2.10 ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
