-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 Alexander S. Kunz wrote: > Hello David Calvarese & everyone else, > > on 23-Feb-2005 at 18:35 you (David Calvarese) wrote: > >>> Then why's your message signed inline and not PGP/MIME? :-) > >> Because I prefer inline signing over PGP/MIME. :) Enigmail can do >> PGP/MIME as well. > > Its the year 2005. I find that PGP gibberish is totally unneccessary, it > can be avoided and the functionality stays the same (personally, I find the > readability is increased, which I, personally again, find more functional > in an email message) ... imagine there was something like "inline HTML" or > whatever. Yikes! :-) >
There is 'Inline HTML'. It's what Outlook Express uses by default. :) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1rc1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCHMXxSlxKVhydU2ARA/NDAJ0V+xc/SNq1xe0ZO8Weg4J6W180qQCfVz0u AQDI8Szm3URijpJdDCXk0h4= =4OsF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
