Hello Paul, On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 you wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PVN> A 1600x1200 picture reduced to 320x240 for viewing in a newsletter PVN> will look worse than the same picture taken at 640x480. Why waste the PVN> resources for an inferior product? Because I keep the pictures (in this case aircraft or flying related) for myself and often don't know one of the results will end up in a flying Newsletter that I also write. I wouldn't buy a camera that only took pictures 640X480. All my pictures are left full size because I have a screen that can take them as that. It boils down to having the choice if you want it doesn't it, a bit like this HTML business that everyone will talk about until the cows come home. Me? I think if there's an option then fine, everyone is catered for. Personally I never use it. -- Regards, Richard | The Bat! 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha & SpamPal | Windows XP (build 2600), version 5. 1 Service Pack 2 | Opera 8.00 build 7401 ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
