Hi Dave Gorman, On 25/2/2005 9:14 AM, you wrote: > I see your point. But on the other hand, these same neophyts could open > the same email in their browser with the same results. Plus, TBird's > display of HTML emails *without* remote images is still far superior and > more readable than TB!'s non-image display.
It's the overlooking of this very basic workaround that perplexes me.
The other thing is that the neophyte is unlikely to be using one of
the browsers that is able to not load images. Furthermore, who browses
with the image loading option disabled by default? Certainly not the
neophyte. :)
--
_ _ _ _
/_\ | | | | (_) ___ | IMAP Clients: The Bat! v3.0.2.8
/ _ \ | | | | | | / -_) | ThunderBird v1.0
/_/ \_\ |_| |_| |_| \___| | OS: WinXP Pro (Service Pack 2)
-=-=-
System halted. There is NOTHING you can do.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
