Hello Peter,

On Thursday, May 12, 2005 at 12:27:33 PM Peter [PF] wrote:

PF> I cannot see why this date
PF> would be shown as the year 2000.

PF> | Received: from xxx ([xxx]) by xxx with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
PF> |          Thu, 12 May 2005 11:01:15 +0200
PF> | Date: Thu May 12 11:01:14 CEST 2005

Compare the format of these two dates ...

The one in 'Received' header is RFC-2822 alike. The one in 'Date'
header is similar, but not the format RFC-2822 demands.
RFC-2822 says it's got to be

Date: 'date-time'

with 'date-time' being ['day-of-week', ] 'date' 'time'
'day' is three letter code for 'day of week' and optional in this
'date-time' string. If present it mus be followed by a colon. This
ain't the case in the given 'Date' header field.
Additionally 'date' is defined as "'day' 'month' 'year'", the given
header misses the 'year'-portion. The 'time' part is defined as
'time-of-day' 'zone' with 'zone' being either '+-OFFSET' or one of
"UT", "GMT" and several North American time zone names. "CEST" is not
defined as a valid zone name for this purpose.

So all in all: the Date-header format is wrong, that's why The Bat!
does not display the correct date.

PF> Is the culprit the FILETIME=[2743DE40:01C556D1]? Why?

I don't think so, but in the end only one of the developers will be
able to answer this question ;-)

HTH
-- 
Regards
Peter Palmreuther

(The Bat! v3.5 Return RC8 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2)

Money is truthful. When a man speaks of honor, make him pay cash.


________________________________________________________
 Current beta is 3.5 Return RC/8 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Reply via email to