On 6/1/05, Mary Bull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Vili! > > On Wednesday, June 01, 2005, 9:34 PM, you wrote: > > > This is the problem: Ritlabs should develop the code (that is not OUR > > code!) and reflect to customers. > > And the point at issue is that I think that RitLabs are getting it > (the IMAP part of the code) functional as quickly as they can. Others, > like Tony, seem to think the code to meet his needs is not receiving > adequate attention (in that sense it is "his," code, i.e., the code > RitLabs is making for its customers).
With just cause I believe. I won't deny that the IMAP support has continued to improve, but it was supposed to just work well over a year ago (maybe two?). Furthermore, we've gone through several iterations of "we'll work on IMAP now" that have only amounted to barely passable IMAP support. I'd like to complain that two feature enhancements (really, necessities IMHO) have just been ignored*, but when normal message viewing and sorting are still not solid, I guess I really can't. * IMAP UCE filtering: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3668 & IMAP QUOTA support: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=1448 -- Kevin ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
