On Thursday, June 02, 2005 at 6:37:08 PM [GMT -0500], Mary Bull wrote: > Well, they are under no obligation to take our advice nor to account > to us for how they manage their affairs.
Quite right. I didn't make my comment looking for a response. Just sharing how I felt at that point with other members who wished to read it. :) > I like the version of The Bat! which is on my machine now, because my > requirements are so few and the little niggling things, like the slow > search function, the deficient scroll-bar scaling, and the failure to > quote smileys reliably from RTV into the Micro-Ed window are things I > can live with. But I shudder to think how a first-time user of The > Bat! would react to not being able to load the program and seeing the > parser error info appear. This is what concerns me too. I care about the programs future and it does get to me when broken builds are posted for public release. > I hope they get the IMAP deficiencies sorted. for your sake and that of > my other IMAP-needing friends on this list. I'll survive. I don't really *need* TB!. I just prefer using it. I manage just fine with Mulberry. > And I do think the intention is to do that. I believe what Stefan has > said about it, and, more recently, 9Val. I'm using it OK here. I just have to do my maintenance stuff with Mulberry. However, for day to day reading and replying, TB! works OK. > Allie, please excuse me for having been out-of-pocket for awhile. We > had a big thunderstorm here, and I shut the computer down. ThunderStorms can be nice provided there's no damage etc. :) -- -= Allie Martin =- The Bat!� v3.5.25 System Specs: http://www.landscreek.net/sysspecs.htm -=-=- If it works, tear it apart and find out why! ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
