Wednesday, June 8, 2005, 4:18:41 AM, (Internet Time - @429) you wrote:
Hello Graham,
FG> I find this thread really interesting, because BayesIT was so buggy in
FG> earlier releases that it drove me (an many others) to the Bayes
FG> Filter.
FG> IMHO, Bayes Filter is FAR faster and more stable than BayesIT ever was
FG> for me. The plugin issue in the last beta series has been resolved in
FG> Bayes Filter 2.0.3 so I am back using this, and these are the
FG> metrics (reset stats after installing 2.0.3 earlier this week):-
FG> HamMails: 18191
FG> SpamMails: 4063
FG> detected Ham: 2087 (99.86%)
FG> detected Spam: 94 (93.62%)
FG> FALSE Ham detected: 6
FG> FALSE Spam detected: 3
FG> .. I think this is pretty good. Can other systems do better?
Here's my stats from K9:
Column 1: Since Fri Nov 19 2004 04:56:37 PM (201 days)
Column 2: Since Fri Nov 19 2004 04:56:37 PM (201 days)
Total number of emails processed 24,869 24,869
124/day 124/day
Number of Good emails processed 7,402 7,402
29.76% 29.76%
Number of Spam emails processed 17,467 17,467
70.24% 70.24%
Percentage of emails that matched whitelist rules 0.00% 0.00%
Percentage of emails that matched blacklist rules 0.00% 0.00%
Number of emails re-classified to Good 148 148
Number of emails re-classified to Spam 126 126
Percent misidentified as Spam (false positives) 0.60% 0.60%
Percent misidentified as Good (false negatives) 0.51% 0.51%
98.90% 98.90%
--
Best regards,
Michael mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! Version 3.5.26
On Windows XP SP2
________________________________________________________
Current beta is 3.5.26 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
