Hello Tony, >> If I wanted to clarify what was the cause was to discard >> any possible problem in TB. > > Personally I think it is a problem with TB. Any threading trouble I had, or > should I say you had, was only evident to people using TB. Mulberry, > Thunderbird and Kmail didn't suffer such trauma :)
It could be that TB is not as "flexible" as perhaps it should, I don't know. > And lets face it, having 1 or 2 non threaded messages can be a very > traumatic experience for some :) Although I do prefer that messages thread properly (it makes it easier to follow a conversation), lack of threading is not traumatic for me and I am used t o it in many other mailing lists and even everyday e-mail exchange. If I pay attention it threading in this lists is to identify possible TB problems. If you recall, previous TB versions had threading by Reference or by Subject. The last beta series _changed_ threading by References to by References+Subject with no possibility of threading _only_ by Reference, which I objected to. This was changed again and it is now possible to thread by References, by Subject or by References+Subject, which should satisfy everyone preferences. Because these many changes is why, if I see a not properly threaded message, I take a detailed look to see if it may be due to a bug in TB introduced when making the mentioned changes. That's all. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.5.25 on Windows 2000 5.0 Service Pack 4 ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.5.26 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
