On Wednesday, July 06, 2005, at 01:48 PM, Manuel Breitfeld wrote: > Without having read the whole thread, I just want to point out, that it's not > always that mathematical and therefore logical as you did point out. > CVS's numbering system for instance goes like this 1.1 ... 1.9 .... 1.10 .... > 1.19 .... 1.20. > That's the "opposite" of the way you described.
I've been referring to TB!'s version numbering and not version numbering in general. TB!'s version numbering has never really followed the CVS numbering method. It has always been a mathematical progression. -- -= Allie M.=- Using TB! v3.51 System Specs: http://specs.aimlink.name =-=-= ...Do NOT look into laser with remaining eyeball! ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.51 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
