In reply to <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :


DAC> On Saturday, July 23, 2005, 3:38:09 AM, Goncalo Farias wrote:

>> I  agree  with  Vili. It shouldn't have default actions. Either the
>> filter  is  able  to  do what it was designed to do or it should be
>> disabled (with or without a warning).

DAC> I  don't  follow  the  logic here. The complaint is that when you
DAC> delete  a  folder,  the program takes a default action and copies
DAC> the  file  to the inbox instead of the deleted folder, and that a
DAC> better  default is to stop the filter from doing anything even if
DAC> the  other things it is doing could include sending a copy of the
DAC> message  to  another  account  or  another user, changing a color
DAC> code,  sending  a  reply  to the sender with some other important
DAC> information. This a bad idea.

The  other  thing  it  could  do  could  be,  for instance, delete the
original  message  (copy  to  one  folder  and  after  that delete the
message).

IMHO,  filters  should  come  in  a  "package"  that  would either "do
everything" or "do nothing" without compromises.


-- 
Best regards,
Goncalo Farias

My WYSIWYG is all GUI


________________________________________________________
 Current beta is 3.51.9 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Reply via email to