8/29/2005 12:11 PM Hi Alexander,
On 8/29/2005 Alexander S. Kunz wrote: ASK> What is the basis for this recommendation? Its detection rate is 90.81% ASK> compared to NOD32's 95.50% (according to the May proactive scanning test at ASK> http://www.av-comparatives.org) - why would anyone want to exchange his ASK> virus protection for a LESS secure product? Can't remember where but I saw documentation that differs. Stability, performance and ease of use weigh in as heavily as detection rate differences, especially when you work with 100's of 'consumers' all over the world using many languages. In the 2+ years I have been using avast! for myself and customers there has been zero infections and that is good enough for me. -- Take Care, Paul The Bat! v.3.60.05 Forerunner (Beta) on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195 ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.60.05 forerunner | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
