Hi Alexander,
ASK> - HTML support should include the template system. This would avoid ALL
ASK> kind of troubles that people who really need to deal with HTML email have
ASK> to deal with, now.
It is on the way, but will be finished in next beta cycle.
ASK> - a simple (and configurable!) logic that falls back to the plain text
ASK> template (when the message is HTML but there is no HTML reply/forward
ASK> template) should be implemented.
Do you mean, that you want to have both Text/HTML templates for
folder/account and HTML should be used only if it is filled?
ASK> I for one would want a reply/forward to/of an HTML message happen "the
ASK> Outlook way" - yes, with all the negative points like top posting and full
ASK> quotes, and not like the current (even though better than nothing) attempt
ASK> to apply a typical plain-text reply-template to HTML messages. But thats
ASK> just me, and others may actually like the current implementation. The point
ASK> is: we don't have a choice.
The point is the same - it needs HTML templates, which are not
finished yet
--
9Val
________________________________________________________
Current beta is 3.61.12 (Echo) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
