--On Wednesday, October 26, 2005 08:07 AM -0500 "-=Curtis=-" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tried Mulberry again. I confirm my distress by seeing a far, far > better margin of performance again. <sigh> Ah well... There's something I failed to mention. Because of the recent hurricane Wilma that hit Mexico, apparently there was damage to the submarine fiberoptic lines for Internet feed to our major ISP in Jamaica. They've been doing some rerouting, but still we're quite affected. As a result, my connection is often quite slow etc. TB! falls smack flat on its face with this situation. I guess it just hammers home my comments about TB! performing pretty well only in the presence of very good available bandwidth (not what your ISP says you're rated to be getting, but what you're really getting at the time you're using TB!). Mulberry runs rings around TB! when the bandwidth is borderline. TB! becomes usable with high available bandwidth. If you can use TB! with a low bandwidth, this likely means your mailboxes contain only few messages each for you to handle. -- -= Curtis =- System specs: http://specs.aimlink.name -=-=- Self-made man: A horrible example of unskilled labor. ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.62.01 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
