Hello Alto Speckhardt & everyone else, on 01-Nov-2005 at 03:00 you (Alto Speckhardt) wrote:
> This editor already can do what you explain MicroEd can't do today. So far, it is you alone who wants MicroEd to behave differently. You consider it a bug, others (including the programmers) consider it "working as designed" (I do so, too). Now, I for one refuse to have something "fixed", because a single user regards a feature working as it is a bug. And as long as there is no consensus whether this is a bug, or a feature request, it can only be treated as a feature request. (which is, by the suggested "optional" nature of the thing, the only choice IMHO anyway, for there is no either/or for a bug). So... lengthy introduction, and now the conclusion: file a wishlist item (aka feature request) on the Bugtracker site. Then you post the link to this wishlist item here, and ask for support. People who like your idea will eventually put a supporting note to your wish. The more notes, the more attention the item will get, I assume. File the wish and see what happens. Everything else is redundant & turning in circles. -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) Scott's Second Law: When an error has been detected and corrected, it will be found to have been correct in the first place. ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.62.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
