On Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 6:55:04 PM, Stefan Tanurkov wrote: > Hi Dwight!
>> If no one at ritlabs is willing to read any of the discussion about >> this subject, then we are just pi$$ing into the wind asking for >> consideration of any change. > Could you please be more concrete? I've read all messages in the > "About TB folders" thread and I could not find anything against > virtual folder. Perhaps, I'm missing something? In your message mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] you said you didn't have time to read the messages about tb folders. Then in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote >> Will it's being in a virtual folder keep it out of the outbox where >> it is at risk of getting sent, > > Yes. As long as the Draft flag is used, messages cannot be sent. I read this to mean that the messages are still sitting in the OUTBOX. At least one of the points of the entire discussion about a draft folder is to get drafts of messages out of the OUTBOX. I took your answer to mean that getting messages out of the OUTBOX was not part of the discussion of possible answers, either because it was off the table or because since you wouldn't (sorry:didn't have time to) read any of the messages about the question you weren't even prepared to understand the desire to have drafts out of the OUTBOX. Besides that, while the virtual folder works ok until you go back to edit the message some more, if you happen to hit put message in the outbox, it gets there unparked and vulnerable to sending. As long as the drafts reside in the OUTBOX, part of the reasons for a DRAFT folder are unfulfilled. -- Dwight A. Corrin 928 S Broadway Wichita KS 67211 316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568 dcorrin at fastmail.fm Using IMAP with The Bat! 3.63.12 (Beta) on Windows XP version 5,1 (Service Pack 2) ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.63.09 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
