Hello Alexander, >> I mean, if %whatever is not recognized as a macro, it should be left >> that way. Or not? >> All I am saying is, we always come up with a workaround instead of a >> real fix... > But its not really a problem, is it? > Any macro interpreted requires its command trigger to be "escaped" when you > want to print them. Think of the backslashes in .reg files...
I just dont see, that with intelligent macro handling why is it necessary? If I would provide a program with a macro, character by character, I would understand it. But if I send the whole text to it... "Hey, there is no such macro as 4%, so I just display it...". Or not? I am developing softwares, I dont see the problem with this. -- Vili ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.70.09 'Qigong' | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
