Hello Maxim Masiutin & everyone else, on 15-Dez-2006 at 20:11 you (Maxim Masiutin) wrote:
> but we had complains that the results of DnsQuery were not resolvable > in the server's side. I beg your pardon but, who complained about that? And why did you listen to him/them/her? We're talking about HELO/EHLO and the communication of a simple SMTP *client* (The Bat!) with an SMTP server! I really can't see why and how the SMTP client should and could supply a resolvable name. Expecting that is nonsense, and a server that does a DNS query if the name is not resolvable anyway should be taken out of the hands of such an incapable administrator, I'm sorry... The other thing is that supplying a local ie. non-resolvable IP address doesn't change anything. If the IP or the name is non-resolvable doesn't make a difference, does it? But privacy-wise and security-wise it does make a difference whether the client's local IP address is revealed. So please, put the local name of the client back into the HELO/EHLO process and end this nonsense. -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de) Every thought is a feat of association. -- Robert Frost ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.86.11 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
